Home / Arnott lays it on the line with smart beta

Arnott lays it on the line with smart beta

(pictured: Rob Arnott)

By Greg Bright

All super funds should subscribe, for free, to the Research Affiliates regular research notes, ‘Fundamentals’. Sure, they will try to steer you to their own smart-beta strategies. But Rob Arnott, the firm’s founder, sometimes even questions his own funds. Last week, he questioned “value” at current prices in smart beta.

  • In the second of a series of papers published last week, Arnott and others from the US-based quant shop which built its business on the Research Affiliates Fundamental Index (RAFI) in the 2000s say that with smart beta, as will other strategies, investors need to ask if the price is right. The first paper was called: “How Smart Beta Can go Horribly Wrong”.

    The latest paper says over the past 50 years “almost all” smart beta strategies and eight factors studied show a negative relationship between starting valuation and subsequent five-year performance.

    Today, valuations of many of the most popular factors and smart beta strategies are well above their historical norms, implying lower future returns, Arnott says.

    “Product proliferation in factor investing and “smart beta” create two interconnected risks. First, few if any products will be introduced without having wonderful historical returns. In many cases, these returns are a consequence of rising valuations. Basically, in product creation our industry is data mining on past performance.

    “This selection bias creates an illusion of high past alpha that often disappears when we subtract the effect of rising relative valuations. The alpha mirage creates implausible expectations for investors, who are disappointed when realized returns almost inevitably fall short, and they switch strategies, typically at a substantial cost.

    “The second risk is far more dangerous: investing when relative valuations are at an extreme: a.k.a. performance chasing. Investing in overpriced strategies is value destroying. High past alpha can quickly become negative future alpha.

    “Investors lock in their loss when they move on to the next strategy with wonderful past returns. Just like in selecting stocks, asset classes, managers, and funds, we are exposed to the same perils when we select factors and smart beta strategies. We marvel that these observations are controversial in some circles.”

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    Super needs a ‘major re-engineering’ for retirement to succeed

    It’s “quite realistic” that many super funds will take too long to build the basics of a retirement income strategy, and the system might need a licencing regime to make sure members are getting the best service.

    Lachlan Maddock | 6th Nov 2024 | More
    Why big super must reckon with geopolitical upheaval

    Super funds have been able to earn “enormously good returns” from strong economic tailwinds and a calm geopolitical backdrop, but that period of stability is now at an end, and they’ll have to adapt to a more uncertain world.

    Lachlan Maddock | 1st Nov 2024 | More
    Super expenses debate misses the forest for the trees

    The boondoggle about superannuation marketing spend is mostly theatre, and does nothing to answer the question of what is really in members’ best financial interests.

    Lachlan Maddock | 1st Nov 2024 | More
    Popular