A key architect of the compulsory retirement savings system lauds its many achievements, stretching from the national economy to the individual. Where it’s double faulting is in serving members – and it needs to be addressed promptly.
With performance and diversification driving demand, these funds are expected to experience four-fold global growth over the next decade to nearly $AU65 trillion.
Lifecycle strategies come with a cost – Frontier
With the ubiquity of MySuper default options, many funds have attempted to provide a more tailored retirement solution to members through the adoption of so-called ‘lifecycle’ strategies. But, a new paper by Frontier Advisors, warns that members may retire with less as a result.
The paper, co-authored by David Carruthers, a principal consultant and head of member solutions at Frontier, says that while a lifecycle strategy provides an element of protection against sequencing risk in a member’s approach to retirement, that comes at a cost of a likely lower balance at retirement.
The paper says that many super funds seem to have made the decision that this is a price worth paying. But, have they canvassed member opinions? Do members know what they may be giving up/
The paper says that it is hoped that funds completed some analysis of underlying membership trends such as:
- engagement rates
- historic switching activity
- choices at retirement, such as annuities or account-based pensions, and
- cash flow trends in retirement.
“While well intentioned, defaulting members into a lifecycle strategy may perpetuate this low level of engagement,” the paper says. “There is the danger that adopting a lifecycle strategy is seen to some extent as job done for the fund with no further need to attempt to regularly engage with members and check that a lifestyle strategy is still in their best interests.”
– G.B.
