Home / News / ‘Affront to free market principles’

‘Affront to free market principles’

News

Treasury’s proposed changes to proxy voting advice have met with fierce resistance from Ownership Matters, which warned the reforms could have a chilling effect on corporate accountability in Australia.

The reforms, which were proposed in the interests of “strengthening the transparency and accountability of proxy advice”, would require proxy advisers to provide their research to companies they are reviewing before they provide it to clients – a move that Ownership Matters (OM) described as “nonsensical” “OM is not aware of any other form of opinion or advice in Australia where the State compels its provision to the subject prior to publication, explicitly for the purpose of allowing them to alter its content,” OM said in a submission to Treasury.

“This proposal should be of grave concern not just to other providers of financial research but to any person interested in preserving a functioning society that values freedom of expression and free enterprise.”
Institutional investors use proxy advisers like OM to research investee companies and to provide voting recommendations for shareholder resolutions. But OM warned that the reforms – which would also require companies to prove they voted independently of those recommendations – “would likely destroy the current productive and frequent engagement between companies and OM”.

“Treasury presents no evidence whatsoever that there has been any detriment suffered as a consequence of the publication of financial research that may influence the voting intentions of institutional investors,” OM said.

“The absence of harm or evidence presented in the Treasury paper seems an odd pretext for detailed and intrusive regulatory intervention in the rights of private citizens…to contract with each other, and which would provide regulatory fiat for large, well-funded companies to pre-emptively censor dissenting opinion through legal threats and harassment.”

Dean Paatsch

The founder of OM, Dean Paatsch, is a commercial lawyer by training, with a background in super as the first chief executive of AIST, before founding Proxy Australia in 2003. This then had several incarnations after its sale in 2005, through ISS Australia, Risk Metrics and ISS Governance Services. Paatsch formed the staff-owned OM in 2011, joined by fellow directors Martin Lawrence and Simon Connal.

OM has questioned why the proposed reforms had been aimed at four main proxy advisers – including itself, the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI), CGI Glass Lewis, and Shareholder Services Australia) – when “numerous financial research providers” and sell-side brokers provide commentary urging investors to accept or reject board proposals.

“We also draw Treasury’s attention to the risk that regulatory over-reach could impact the operating models of sell side researchers, investment banks, proxy solicitors and other firms who are also in the business of advising investors how to use their voting rights,” OM said.

“Setting up a regime where these firms were required to pre-release their reports (as we would ours) would be curious, to say the least, in a global context.”

  • Lachlan Maddock

    Lachlan is editor of Investor Strategy News and has extensive experience covering institutional investment.




    Print Article

    Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular