Home / News / NAB okay but other partners to go in Prime/HIP merger

NAB okay but other partners to go in Prime/HIP merger

News

(Pictured: Ross Bernays)

The proposed merger between Health Industry Plan and Prime Super, which has been under discussion for at least three months, will result in a more sustainable and competitive fund of $2.4 billion and 150,000 members.

Under the announcement last week, HIP members will transfer under the ‘successor fund transfer’ on May 1, which will set a cracking pace for all involved. Investor Strategy News first referred to the merger discussions last September.

  • The HIP brand will remain, at least for a while, following the example set by First State Super when it merged with Health Super. Both mergers demonstrate that the industries covered by pre-merger funds do not matter as much as membership profiles, union and industry association affiliations and so forth.

    Prime’s chief executive, Lachlan Baird, becomes the new chief executive and HIP’s chief executive, Ross Bernays, becomes the new chief investment officer. Both funds have run lean staffing, with Prime’s John Deininger, for instance, doubling as finance and investment manager.

    But there will be at least two losers among the asset consultants and member administrators, the services for both of which are likely to be put out for tender. NAB Asset Servicing, however, is the custodian for both funds, which should streamline the transfer of assets. NAB was re-signed by Prime for five years starting last year.

    Prime uses Access Capital as asset consultant, while HIP uses JANA. If Access loses the new mandate it will have only one major super fund client left, MTAA Super.

    On the administration side, Prime uses Link (AAS) and HIP uses SuperPartners.

    Bernays said: “Merging with Prime Super will ensure all members and employers benefit from greater economies of scale, with the aim of delivering improvements to the financial wellbeing of every one of our members.”

    Investor Strategy News


    Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular