Home / Analysis / Alpha awaits in activist strategies: Frontier

Alpha awaits in activist strategies: Frontier

Analysis

It’s a truth universally acknowledged that equity market returns are likely to be muted going forward. But salvation might arrive in the form of domestic activist strategies.

“From a timing perspective, we think the forward-looking environment presents a much more challenging return outlook for equity investors given the extended low interest rate and bull market environment that has persisted for large-cap growth stocks until more recently,” write Frontier’s James Gunn and Fraser Murray and “Opportunistic ideas for a challenging return outlook”, the latest from the Frontier line.

“The implication is that investors may not be able to rely so heavily on headline equity market returns (i.e. beta), hence an increasingly important role for index agnostic, opportunistic strategies delivering less correlated source of alpha/return in domestic equities, global developed and emerging markets.”

Gunn and Murray believe that the same is true for big super funds, even with the Your Future Your Super (YFYS) performance test nipping at their heels. As has been remarked endlessly elsewhere, many of the funds that are at will likely move closer to the benchmark and away from riskier strategies due to the existential threat posed by failure.

“However, our view is that it is even more critical for super funds (given YFYS) to ensure they are deploying their active risk and fee budget in the most efficient means as it relates to portfolio return enhancement and diversification, albeit consistent with their specific tolerance for high active risk strategies and the associated fee load, additional monitoring/complexity and capacity constraints,” Gunn and Murray write.

The main thrust of their research concerns the opportunity in China A-shares; many super funds and other institutions are now exploring the opportunity set in Australia’s largest trading partner even as geopolitical tensions call into question the future viability of the region. Gunn and Murray believe the key appeal here is the inefficiency created by high levels of retail trading and the significant liquidity on-hand, while access opportunities for foreign investors and the instruments available for hedging are also increasing.

But Frontier is also taking a closer look at domestic-focused activist strategies. They’ve not been as popular in Australia as in other sophisticated markets despite a “highly conducive regulatory landscape” encouraging productive engagement, but Frontier anticipates that more institutional-quality activist-focused strategies will soon come to market, including those of offshore managers.

“Similar value-adding engagement objectives are pursued through mainstream equity managers (often with significant effect in small-caps),” Gunn and Murray write. “However in our view, exposure to an activist-focused strategy provides a more targeted approach through a typically concentrated number of investments, deeper research conducted on these concentrated holdings and with the potential for higher, less correlated portfolio returns.”

As always, manager selection will be key, and it’s likely not for the faint of heart: high tracking error will add to YFYS risk, while the profile and engagement style of some forms of activism – or specific escalations – might not align with the long-term approach of some super funds.

“The primary focus of these strategies in an ESG context is the “G”, but we also see a material opportunity for environmentally and socially-focused impact engagement in an Australian context,”
Gunn and Murray write. “We’ve seen in the US how activist hedge funds (in collaboration with the voting power and voice of index providers and pension funds) have delivered unprecedented climate-focused outcomes – for example, the Exxon board upheaval.”

“An activist strategy focused primarily on large and mid-cap ideas is likely to be a more scalable and relevant Australian equities niche for larger and growing asset owners compared to less liquid and capacity-constrained return-enhancing strategies like micro-caps.”

Lachlan Maddock

  • Lachlan is editor of Investor Strategy News and has extensive experience covering institutional investment.




    Print Article

    Related
    ‘No pain, no gain’: Marks on the investing game of chess

    Good investing requires real sacrifices, according to Oaktree’s Howard Marks, but you can’t expect to be compensated just for making them.

    Lachlan Maddock | 19th Apr 2024 | More
    Big super’s hard bargains pay off: CEM Benchmarking

    Australian super funds roundly beat their global peers on investment costs due to a combination of hardball negotiations around fees and savvy implementation in pricier asset classes.

    Lachlan Maddock | 19th Apr 2024 | More
    How CFS practices the art (and the science) of manager selection

    Numbers might give you some comfort but they don’t tell the whole story, according to CFS. To get that, you have to dig a little deeper – and take a lot of meetings.

    Lachlan Maddock | 17th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular