Home / News / ‘So obviously should happen’: ISPT, IFM Investors mull merger

‘So obviously should happen’: ISPT, IFM Investors mull merger

Industry super fund owned IFM Investors and ISPT are exploring a merger at the request of their shareholders amidst a challenging outlook for commercial property.
News

The merger, first reported by the Australian Financial Review, would create a $233 billion infrastructure and real assets manager and is being explored at the request of “significant shareholders in each entity”.

“A potential merger recognises that IFM and ISPT have complementary businesses and capabilities,” IFM said in a statement. “They also have an extensive common shareholder base. Any merger must create value for the shareholders and unitholders of IFM Investors and ISPT and deliver strong financial outcomes for their members. Discussions are ongoing between the organisations as they seek to identify and assess the opportunities and risks for their shareholders, investors, businesses and people.”

While the synergies are obvious, the two organisations have never been in formal or informal merger talks before; a 2018 joint venture that would leverage IFM’s strong presence in Europe with ISPT’s property experience to invest in gateway cities in the UK and Europe was kiboshed by the pandemic and Brexit. Those two events changed the risk profile for a number of cities (but particularly London), and the JV was quietly abandoned.

Industry fund sources said that the merger talks have been going on since at least last year and are significantly progressed, and that the merger will probably go ahead. One source at a large fund said the merger “so obviously should happen” owing to the similarity in the two organisations’ activities.

ISPT was launched as Industry Super Property Trust in the early 90s, when the property crash sent values plummeting and cleared out many of the existing unlisted property trusts. At the time, the actual commercial properties were selling on attractive yields with strong tenancies. Westpac Financial Services was the initial manager though management was later insourced. While commercial property has been challenged in the short-term ISPT has a robust track record, though its FUM has hit a wall as superannuation funds set up their own unlisted property platforms

ISPT was also set up as a not-for-profit fund manager – and shareholders, which include AustralianSuper, Cbus, and HESTA, sit on the board –  while IFM was a more independent for-profit manager owned by the industry funds; that model was perhaps better suited to growth and globalisation, and offshore clients now contribute a greater chunk of revenues than the industry funds. Its current CEO is David Neal (pictured).

Lachlan Maddock

  • Lachlan is editor of Investor Strategy News and has extensive experience covering institutional investment.




    Print Article

    Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular