Home / Better automation needed in Asia Pac post trade

Better automation needed in Asia Pac post trade

(Pictured: Matthew Chan)

Post trade processes in the Asia Pacific region are in dire need of improvement, according to a study commissioned by global transactions systems company Omgeo.

The study, one of the most comprehensive on practices in the region to date, was conducted for DTCC-owned Omgeo by Insight Asia Banking & Finance Consulting. 

  • Omgeo director, enterprise and strategic planning APAC, Matthew Chan, said the research was commissioned to gather a level of detail that was previously lacking for the region.

    “We haven’t been able to get much granularity in the Asia Pacific region,” he said.

    The study was conducted via interviews with 100 senior operations executives across 13 countries.

    The vast majority – 93 per cent – cited increased need for automation of post trade processes, 32 per cent wanted more straight through processing (STP) and over 20 per cent cited automation in fixed income as a priority.

    Of the 13 Asia Pacific countries, Australia had the highest level of trade automation in both equities at 88 per cent, and fixed income at 69 per cent.

    The region overall had an average of 71 per cent automation in equities and 55 per cent in fixed income.

    “A friction point is the back office not keeping up with some of the ambitions of the front office,” Chan says.

    One of the areas most lacking in automation is confirmation. In the survey it scored 6.9 out of ten for equities and 5.2 for fixed income.

    “Confirmation is probably the bottleneck part of the process. It’s the piece that is least automated,” Chan says. 

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    Japan’s equity market is surging. But is it sustainable?

    The Land of the Rising Sun has had more than its fair share of false dawns since its economic bubble burst in 1989, but now there is a growing expectation among some analysts that the current share market rally is sustainable in the long term.

    Nicholas Way | 17th May 2024 | More
    What big super can learn from small funds

    Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to member services. Megafunds might be able to mass customise, but when you’ve got two million members it’s tough to bring the personal touch.

    Lachlan Maddock | 15th May 2024 | More
    Endowments’ long game suffers short-term setback

    The famous and closely watched US endowment model took a hit in FY23, with smaller, equity-heavy investors taking the lead. But the longer-term superiority of a chunkier exposure to alternatives remains unchallenged.

    James Dunn | 15th May 2024 | More
    Popular