Home / Risk control as a return generator

Risk control as a return generator

(Pictured: Denis Carroll)

Investing for risk can add real value to portfolios over time, with a recent paper based on a time series of live decisions for a UK-based fiduciary investor, showing significant outperformance by adopting a risk-control target rather than returns.

The paper, by consulting group CheckRisk, followed the implementation of its advice at IFG, a UK and Irish financial services group, across four portfolios from September last year until May this year. IFG, which has about £20 billion (A$36.1 billion) under management, applied CheckRisk’s risk-adjusted asset model (RAAM) to its ‘growth’, ‘balanced’, ‘cautious’ and ‘yield’ portfolios. The portfolios were run on a real-time test basis prior to a proposed launch later this year.

  • At the heart of the different approach, according to CheckRisk’s Australian-based chief executive, Denis Carroll, is that investing for risk considers when an investor is being “paid” to take risk or not.

    The paper shows that in the test period, the four IFG portfolios each outperformed its benchmark with less volatility than the benchmark itself. The portfolios also outperformed each of their cash-plus targets as agreed with IFG management.

    The difference in returns from making changes by using RAAM signals and not doing so between September 2013 and May this year were:

    > IFG Growth: 11.51 per cent return (benchmark 8.57 per cent), standard deviation 8.85 per cent (benchmark 9.65 per cent).

    > IFG Balanced: 9.64 per cent return (6.99 per cent), standard deviation 6.65 per cent (6.83 per cent).

    > IFG Cautious: 8.62 per cent return (6.48 per cent), standard deviation 5.12 per cent (5.46 per cent).

    > IFG Yield: 9.06 per cent return (6.47 per cent), standard deviation 5.92 per cent (6.39 per cent).

    In April, RAAM recommended significant changes due to observed market-based risks. The changes were implemented by the manager, with startling results over just a one-month period. The results for the month were:

    > IFG Growth: 1.17 per cent return (0.74 per cent if no changes were made).

    > IFG Balanced: 1.49 per cent return (0.62 per cent).

    > IFG Cautious: 1.86 per cent return (1.18 per cent).

    > IFG Yield: 1.82 per cent return (1.27 per cent).

    View the full paper.

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    Japan’s equity market is surging. But is it sustainable?

    The Land of the Rising Sun has had more than its fair share of false dawns since its economic bubble burst in 1989, but now there is a growing expectation among some analysts that the current share market rally is sustainable in the long term.

    Nicholas Way | 17th May 2024 | More
    What big super can learn from small funds

    Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to member services. Megafunds might be able to mass customise, but when you’ve got two million members it’s tough to bring the personal touch.

    Lachlan Maddock | 15th May 2024 | More
    Endowments’ long game suffers short-term setback

    The famous and closely watched US endowment model took a hit in FY23, with smaller, equity-heavy investors taking the lead. But the longer-term superiority of a chunkier exposure to alternatives remains unchallenged.

    James Dunn | 15th May 2024 | More
    Popular