Home / News / Contenders line up for crack at Russell in round two

Contenders line up for crack at Russell in round two

News

At least six final bidders remain in the running to buy Russell Investments, according to offshore media reports. Towers Watson and Threadneedle are considered among the frontrunners.
The Financial Times (FT) last week named global asset consulting firm Towers Watson and Ameriprise, owner of funds management firm Threadneedle, as second-round bidders for the Russell Investments business, along with an anonymous Chinese firm and a couple of private equity firms.
According to the report, one of the initial bidders, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, may have dropped out of the process, which is being managed by Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase.
“[Sources] said that the interest from Towers Watson, which is focused on consulting rather than asset management, may mean that other risk managers such as insurance brokers Aon and Marsh and McLennan [owners of Mercer] are also following the process closely,” the FT story says.
The London Stock Exchange (LSE), which bought the Frank Russell Company in 2014 for about US$2.7 billion, confirmed this February it would spin off the group’s investments and asset consulting arm.
In a recent statement, LSE said it had fielded “a good number of indications of interest” in the Russell Investments business, which is tipped to sell for up to $1.5 billion.
The LSE will keep the Russell index business, combining it with its existing FTSE indices arm. Collectively, over US$9 trillion in assets globally are benchmarked to the combined indices, including US$5 trillion against Russell’s.
According to just-published LSE results, US$400 billion in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are linked to the group’s combined indices, with US$242 billion against FTSE benchmarks.
Globally, Russell Investments has about US$272 billion in its multi-management funds business, according to the LSE results.
– Investment News NZ

Investor Strategy News


  • Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular