Home / News / … as 22,000 ‘uber’ SMSFs get set for slow decline

… as 22,000 ‘uber’ SMSFs get set for slow decline

News

Michael Hallinan
Large, or ‘uber’, SMSFs are now almost impossible to build, according to Michael Hallinan, a superannuation lawyer. And capping the pension-phase earnings is a solution to a problem which no longer exists.
According to Hallinan, special counsel for Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers, the problem with capping the amount of super which can enjoy tax-free earnings in pension phase is that it is a solution to a legacy problem which is not likely to happen in the future.
Before July 2007, there were limits on the amount of benefits which could be taken on a concessionally taxed basis (the old Reasonable Benefits Limits regime) but no limit on the amount of undeducted contributions which could be made.
“Currently, we have the reverse: limits on the amount of undeducted contributions which could be made and no limits on the amount of benefits which can be taken on a concessionally taxed basis,” Hallinan says.
“Uber SMSFs’,” which Hallinan defines as those with more than $10 million in assets, “became ‘uber’ as a result of the pre-July 2007 system.  It is very difficult to contribute sufficient monies under the current system to create an ‘uber’ SMSF,” he says.
“If an individual could contribute the maximum contribution each year for 40 years: the total contributed amount would be about $8.2 million ($180,000 plus 85 per cent of $30,000).  Obviously, there would be earnings to add to the calculation, but a real return of 2.55 per cent (3 per cent gross less 15 per cent tax) may produce $14.5 million in present-day dollars.  Realistically, how many people at age 25 could contribute to super $205,500 each year for 40 years?”
The latest ATO statistics suggest that there are about 22,000 SMSFs which have assets greater than $10 million.

Investor Strategy News


  • Related
    ‘A force to be reckoned with’: Funds heading for retirement tipping point

    Some members are excited for retirement, while others approach it with a “real sense of shame and fear”. Funds are going to have to figure out how to cater to both groups or risk failing them all.

    Lachlan Maddock | 20th Nov 2024 | More
    Super early access for housing would hurt every member’s balance: Aware

    Opening up early access to super for housing would have a negative effect on the balances of even those members that don’t dig into their savings, with funds forced to adopt more conservative investment strategies and hold more liquid assets.

    Lachlan Maddock | 15th Nov 2024 | More
    HESTA brings total portfolio thinking to ‘nuanced’ housing crisis

    The circa $88 billion industry fund for workers in health and community services reckons that alleviating the affordable housing crisis will boost its other investments by easing the cost of living and inflation.

    Lachlan Maddock | 15th Nov 2024 | More
    Popular