Home / Lessons for Aussie funds as CalPERS cuts more managers

Lessons for Aussie funds as CalPERS cuts more managers

(pictured: Wylie Tolette)

It may be three times bigger than Australia’s largest super fund, but there are still lessons to be learned from its investment and operational strategies by big Australian investors. Here’s why, and how, CalPERS has cut its manager roster by more than 25 per cent.

The US$302 billion Californian public sector fund, which is mostly defined benefit accounts, disclosed after its monthly investment committee meeting last week how it had cut its overall cost of investment management in the past five years. This has been primarily from insourcing investments.

  • According to Asset International’s ‘CIO Alert’ newsletter, the fund has gone from spending US$911 million between 2009 and 2010 on management fees to US$750 million in 2014-2015. Total portfolio costs, excluding performance fees, have dropped from US$1.02 billion to US$888 million over the same five years.

    The fund said it would now look for “alternative ways” to invest in “private asset classes” which currently accounted for nearly 90 per cent of its fee spend. The fund had cut management fee expenses by US$161 million in the last five years by bringing assets inhouse, despite the total fund assets nearly doubling in size during that time.

    CalPERS has reduced the number of external managers used from 212 to 159 since 2014 and aims to get this number down to about 100.

    ‘CIO Alert’ quoted Wylie Tollette, CalPERS chief operating investment officer, as saying: “We need managers’ help to execute the goals of our program… However, we want to make sure those managers are strategically aligned with the objectives and the mission of CalPERS.”

    Private investments accounted for 88 per cent of eternal management costs and this would be the focus of further cost savings. The fund currently manages about 68 per cent of its assets internally.

    Australia’s largest fund, Australian Super, which currently manages about A$90 billion, is half-way through a program to internalise the management of about one-third of its assets. Other big funds, including UniSuper, which is already past that level, and REST, Sunsuper, and others are going down the same path.

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    Institutional investors to boost private allocations: State Street

    Private markets could be almost on par with listed assets in institutional investor portfolios before the end of this decade, according to a new State Street study.

    David Chaplin | 3rd May 2024 | More
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    Future Fund sticks to its guns while inflation sticks around

    Surging equity markets have driven the Future Fund’s return higher, but its prediction that inflation will be stickier than expected has been born out and it “remains conscious of the potential for significant deterioration”.

    Staff Writer | 1st May 2024 | More
    Popular