Home / News / Australian social benefit bonds on AXA IM global watch-list

Australian social benefit bonds on AXA IM global watch-list

News

(Pictured: Matt Christensen)

Australian developments in the social impact investing space are drawing the attention of global investors.

Matt Christensen, global head of responsible investment at AXA Investment Management, in Australia recently to speak at the GTQ Investing in Responsibility Conference, said the Australian social benefit bonds were on a watch list of around 10 similar kinds of products around the world for potential inclusion in its impact fund-of-funds product.

  • AXA IM is working on a global social impact fund-of-funds, which it has been running internally, that should be ready for external launch early next year.

    “We’re the first chain and we’re investing in what we think are high quality impact investing funds and those funds put the money to work,” Christensen says.

    As part of that fund, AXA has set aside an amount for SBBs.

    “For us we are working through what happens in Australia,” Christensen says.

    “[Things like] how are they being priced and what are the real risks.”

    A social benefit bond is a form of funding for social services in a three-way partnership between governments, social service providers and investors.

    Investors invest in a bond, which is used to fund a social program – for example a program designed to prevent juvenile recidivism, or one to stop children entering fostercare by helping their parents.

    A government pays the provider of that program a funding amount, dependent on that program achieving certain performance targets. A return is then paid to the investors from the government allocation, dependent on those targets being reached.

    The AXA IM fund of funds also invests in microfinance, education and healthcare. Assessing social investments requires different metrics and analytics to most traditional types of investments.

    For example, Christensen says the key metrics they look at when examining microfinance funds include:

    > Are loans being made on a declining rate, rather than floating rate, of interest;

    > Are the loans going to a majority of rural, rather than urban, citizens;

    > Gender reach, i.e. the proportion of loans to women versus men;

    > Repeat loans. Red flags are waved if loans keep going to the same people.

    “We have two internal teams. It requires two skill sets,” Christensen says of the research involved.

    One of those teams is the responsible investment team, which he runs, and the other is the fund-of-fund team. 

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular