Home / Analysis / ‘Costly’ strategies actually save money – bfinance survey

‘Costly’ strategies actually save money – bfinance survey

Analysis

In the largest asset owner survey it has conducted, consulting and manager search firm bfinance uncovered that the trend to alternative, and more ‘costly’ – in terms of fees – strategies has, overall, saved money for big pension and super funds. The survey of 485 fiduciary investors, including 37 from Australia and New Zealand, spoke for US$8 trillion in assets.

Kathryn Saklatvala, bfinance director of investment content, said the results of the survey were “quite remarkable”. The survey was conducted with the assistance of Pensions & Investments media organisation of the US.

Saklatvala said: “Although the average investor has transitioned towards a more complex portfolio, featuring greater use of non-traditional (and typically more costly) asset classes, they have achieved savings which more than outweigh those additional expenses. As a result, asset allocators’ average costs have fallen rather than risen over a three-year period.

  • “Furthermore, those savings are not necessarily coming from high-impact strategic shifts, such as insourcing or passive management. Although a minority (31 per cent) have moved towards passive equity over the last three years and 19 per cent have increased the proportion of assets managed in-house. Other less-publicised tactics such as mandate consolidation and ‘Transaction Cost Analysis’ have proven more popular. At the top of the list: successful fee renegotiations.”

    The study also uncovers substantial geographical differences. In a nutshell, European and Australian investors have reduced their asset management fees – and costs in general – more than their North American and Asian/Middle Eastern counterparts, Saklatvala says.

    For Australian and New Zealand institutional investors, Vishal Sharma, a senior associate in bfinance’s Sydney office, said: “We hope that the findings give the reader a fresh perspective on the key issues facing our clients and peers alike, such as asset allocation, implementation and costs.

    “The focus on spending has rarely been stronger than it is today, particularly in Australia where consolidation and scale continue to dominate industry discussions. Yet there is one key area where investors must take care not to cut back: governance, He said last week.

    “In portfolios with rising complexity and illiquidity, one of the most pressing challenges is for asset owners to achieve good governance of their implementation decisions. Compared with traditional public market investments, private markets can exhibit higher performance dispersion, higher concentration, higher risk of capital loss, higher costs and a high degree of structural/industry change from one cycle to the next. Robust governance frameworks have never been more important.”

    – G.B.

    Investor Strategy News




    Print Article

    Related
    Beware unbridled animal spirits: Ruffer

    A world where animal spirits are running wild is also one that has temporarily divorced from fundamentals. Experience tells us this often doesn’t end well. 

    Oliver Shale | 27th Feb 2025 | More
    Why State Super thinks defined benefit could (and should) rise again

    The chief executive of the $40 billion fund says that bringing back defined benefit funds could make the public service an attractive career path again and strengthen the social compact with nurses, teachers and police.

    Lachlan Maddock | 21st Feb 2025 | More
    The pandemic lessons that put this fundie ahead of the pack

    Longview Partners was on the bleeding edge of machine learning adaption in funds management. But it’s mostly steered clear of the AI boom that’s taken markets by storm.

    Lachlan Maddock | 21st Feb 2025 | More
    Popular