Home / Analysis / Sovereign wealth funds in a disappointing year

Sovereign wealth funds in a disappointing year

The world's most transparent sovereign wealth and pension funds have returned "disappointing results" as the drop in bond and stock prices finally kneecapped a decade of growth.
Analysis

The world’s most transparent sovereign wealth and pension funds have returned “disappointing results” as the drop in bond and stock prices finally kneecapped a decade of growth, according to Global SWF’s August report.

While it’s too early to issue a definite statement, Global SWF (headed up by Diego Lopez, photo at top) says 2022 might finally be the year in which the size of the industry declines, as measured by its AUM- something that neither the GFC nor Covid-19 managed to do.

Norges Bank Investment Management, the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, returned -4.9 per cent in the first quarter off the back of its massive passive exposure to listed equities. That translates to a loss of US$73 billion, and its second quarter numbers, which will be released in mid-August, may be “much worse”. CalPERS has returned -12.5 per cent (a loss of US$63 billion), while Japan’s GPIF, the world’s largest public pension fund, managed a relatively good return of -1.1 per cent due to its exposure to domestic markets.

“In this context, Global SWF has estimated the underlying losses the industry may have experienced during the first and second quarters of the year,” the report says. “Overall, SWFs may have lost US$ 2.1 trillion and PPFs, US$3.9 trillion, totalling US$6.0 trillion (-18 per cent of AUM).”

“It is important to highlight that these are not realized losses and may not be reflected in our updates if the funds do not choose to report or to take them, depending on their accounting standards.”

Still, there’s a silver lining for the 50 per cent of SWFs sourced from commodities, which are poised to receive large surpluses by year-end off the back of increased oil prices. Pension plans will also continue to receive net contributions from participants, albeit at a lower pace.

Investment activity in the first few months of 2022 also confirmed a trend that Global SWF has observed in recent years, with state-owned investors investing less in G7+ nations (66 per cent in FY17 to 55 per cent in YTD2022) and more in Brazil, Russia, India, and China (13 per cent to 23 per cent).

“In the context of a highly polarized world, this matters,” the report says.

Lachlan Maddock

  • Lachlan is editor of Investor Strategy News and has extensive experience covering institutional investment.




    Print Article

    Related
    Why asset allocators shouldn’t fear the future

    If there’s one lesson for investors from the past five years, it’s that chopping and changing their strategy – even in the face of massive market turmoil – doesn’t always pay.

    Lachlan Maddock | 20th Nov 2024 | More
    The China picture is rosier than it appears: Ruffer

    Investors have concluded “ABC” – Anything But China – but there’s a compelling case for this calculated risk, according to Ruffer’s Duncan MacInnes.

    Duncan MacInnnes | 20th Nov 2024 | More
    How funds can balance sustainability and survival

    Your Future, Your Super makes it harder for funds to push deeper into some sustainable investment strategies, but has “counter-intuitively” resulted in funds looking to take a more complex approach to stewardship.

    Lachlan Maddock | 13th Nov 2024 | More
    Popular