Home / News / Adjust the benchmarks for faith-based funds: ASFA

Adjust the benchmarks for faith-based funds: ASFA

ASFA wants the YFYS performance test benchmarks tweaked to account for the exclusions and negative screens that faith- and values-based funds use.
News

While the Treasury consultation suggests applying a supplementary test to faith-based products that have failed the performance test, ASFA (headed up by Martin Fahy, photo at top) believes this would create the perception that they had been granted “special treatment” and that the main test should instead be overhauled to account for it.

ASFA says this approach was likely adopted in order to minimize work for APRA, but that accepting the premise of benchmarking in the first place suggests that there should be only one “appropriately constructed benchmark against which any such assessment is made.”

“If a product has made a “values-based” or “principles-based” decision not to invest in one or more assets then it is not appropriate to assess that product against a benchmark that includes the performance of those assets,” ASFA said in its submission to the consultation. “Instead, the benchmark should be adjusted by removing those assets and the product assessed against the adjusted benchmark.”

“By way of example, if a product has decided not to invest in tobacco products, or armaments, or gambling, because of the deleterious effect on public and individual health, the relevant benchmark(s) should be adjusted by removing the performance of those products from that benchmark.”

ASFA agrees with the proposition that trustees should be required to apply to APRA with respect to their product status in order to have their performance test adjusted, but suggests that the scope of Treasury’s review into the treatment of faith-based funds should be broadened to include all “values-based” products that impose limitations on investing in certain assets.

The performance test could then be adjusted for the product based on the trustee certifying that it employs a “‘values-based’, or “principles-based” investment strategy, that is disclosed to its members in its regulated disclosures and marketing materials, and has, as a question of fact, employed particular filters/screens.”

Staff Writer


  • Related
    What poor investment governance really costs members

    A new report “from the coalface” of super fund investing has gone some way to quantifying the cost of shonky investment management, with members potentially losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Lachlan Maddock | 2nd May 2024 | More
    ‘It comes at a cost’: Small funds fret APRA levy increase

    A number of super funds managing less than $10 billion have been slugged with an increase in their restricted APRA levy of more than 80 per cent even as the regulator pushes them to keep costs down.

    Lachlan Maddock | 30th Apr 2024 | More
    Megafunds split on future of YFYS

    Australia’s biggest super funds disagree on what the new Your Future, Your Super performance test should look like, but they both think the consequences for failure should be just as weighty – and apply to everybody equally.

    Lachlan Maddock | 26th Apr 2024 | More
    Popular