Home / Paul Woolley debate: the vulnerability of our institutions

Paul Woolley debate: the vulnerability of our institutions

Ron Bird
The annual Paul Woolley Centre conference, organised by University of Technology Sydney, this year includes a four-person debate on the resilience or otherwise of the financial system post-GFC and the vulnerability of financial institutions. The conference program was announced last week (download PDF).
The London School of Economics-based Paul Woolley Centre funds research on capital market dysfunctionality and the UTS conference – to be held on October 8-9 at UTS’s Sydney campus – showcases some of that research as well as discussing current issues. It is organised by Professor Ron Bird with assistance from Jack Gray, who will also chair the debate.
The debates have in the past proved to be a lively and sometimes controversial component of the conference. The full topic this year is: “That this house now agrees with Alan Greenspan’s 2004 claim that ‘not only have individual financial institutions become less vulnerable to shocks… but the financial system as a whole has become more resilient’.”
For the affirmative are Tom Valentine of Macquarie Graduate School of Management and Graham Harman of Russell Investments. For the negative are Ross Barry from First State Super and Brian Parker from Sunsuper.
The debate follows a keynote presentation by Professor Kevin Davis from ACFS titled “Looking Back on the Murray Inquiry”.
There are several other keynote addresses including two on short-termism – by Professor Catherine Casamatta from Toulouse University and Dr Geoff Warren from CIFR – and one on dark pools by Professor Talis Putnins from UTS.
The conference is for invited academics and industry participants. Interested parties should contact Ron Bird (email: [email protected])

Investor Strategy News




  • Print Article

    Related
    How to find hedge funds investing in ‘dynamism and change’: Panel

    There’s around 15,000 hedge funds in the world – but how many of them are really hedge funds? When you’re looking for non- or less-correlated returns, it might pay to stay away from a long bias.

    Lachlan Maddock | 27th Nov 2024 | More
    Optimising portfolio returns with new investing models

    Since the emergence of “Modern Portfolio Theory” and the “Capital Asset Pricing Model” in the late 1960s, institutional investors have taken a quantitatively driven approach to portfolio construction, looking to create portfolio diversification and obtain better risk-adjusted returns by balancing their asset-class exposures. This journey has seen several important advancements in thinking about how to optimally achieve desired results.

    Staff Writer | 22nd Nov 2024 | More
    For total portfolio approach to succeed, funds need more than good intentions

    Funds that want to take the total portfolio approach first need to get the total portfolio view. To do that they not only need data – and lots of it – but a rock-solid understanding of exactly how they’re going to use it.

    Lachlan Maddock | 22nd Nov 2024 | More
    Popular