An ASIC report notes the boom in demand for this asset, saying it heightens the need for “better-quality data” about the size of this sector where estimates range between $1.8 billion and $188 billion.
CPA Australia has weighed into the debate about the cost to oversee the industry, adding its voice to those who argue the fee structure favours the larger funds.
‘Liberation Day’ prompts abrupt repricing in global credit markets
For many months, strong fundamentals have provided a useful underpinning to credit markets, but unprecedented demand has been the key driver of spreads compressing – making valuations perilously high in some traditional market segments.
While this backdrop continued in the first quarter of 2025, trade tariff-related concerns had begun already to have an impact, with spreads widening across investment-grade and high-yield markets.
Unsurprisingly, the biggest moves in credit markets came post-quarter after President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcements. Following the news, markets have been highly volatile, with credit spreads widening materially across credit asset classes.
In my opinion, concerns over the global growth outlook and uncertainty around the impact of tariffs have driven a significant repricing across credit markets, with spreads in traditional markets, such as US high yield, materially wider than at the start of the year.
The speed of recent market moves has been remarkable. For instance, as the graph below highlights, spreads in the US high-yield market have gone from being historically tight (fifth percentile) to a more reasonable level (50th percentile).
Credit market repricing – rolling 10-year percentile of credit spreads
Source: Ninety One, ICE Indices
Forecasting the ultimate level of tariffs and quantifying their eventual impact on the global economy remains highly challenging. However, the near-term impact on the outlook for growth is unambiguously weaker, and the likely inflationary impact creates uncertainty over the outlook for monetary policy.
Companies will struggle to make decisions over investment and production in the short term, margin pressure from the tariff pass-through is uncertain, and the typical response to this uncertainty is to hire less, produce less and invest less.
Our response to this uncertain backdrop is to generally favour more defensive areas and domestically oriented sectors that are less likely to be impacted by tariffs.
In our view, it is vital to focus on issuers’ underlying credit fundamentals and their ability to withstand volatility during this period of a heightened uncertainty. Investors must be selective to ensure they limit their exposure to businesses that are likely to face a material new shock to their operating model.
More broadly, there is still a healthy degree of dispersion between asset classes, both in terms of valuations and fundamentals. Specialist areas of the credit market continue to stand out.
Bank capital (AT1s), for instance, is supported by strong fundamentals and favourable demand/supply dynamics; most banks called their AT1s in the first quarter and this theme looks set to continue given the extent to which banks have already pre-financed. Even here, though, selectivity is key.
Overall, our preference is for higher-quality components of the investment opportunity set. As risk premia start to rise, expect new opportunities to begin to emerge over the coming weeks. Certainly, we will be proactive in taking advantage of areas of the market that offer compelling risk-adjusted return potential.
