Home / Analysis / Government hints at changes to Future Fund mandate

Government hints at changes to Future Fund mandate

Finance minister Katy Gallagher has confirmed that she held informal talks with the sovereign wealth fund’s Board of Guardians amidst speculation its mandate could be changed to align it with the transition to net zero.
Analysis

At a hearing of the senate committee on public administration and finance on Tuesday night, senator Jane Hume pursued finance minister Katy Gallagher over the question of whether the government would change the Future Fund’s investment mandate to align it with the legislative goal of achieving net zero by 2050.

But while Gallagher conceded that there had been discussions around changes to the investment mandate, she declined to say whether those changes would focus on net zero.

“We had a general discussion with the board and we’re putting some thinking around amendments to the investment mandate, but we would be discussing those with the Future Fund board before they were finalised,” Gallagher said.

  • Gallagher’s comments align with those made by Treasurer Jim Chalmers last week, who said that “any responsible government” would review the Future Fund through time.

    The Future Fund’s current investment mandate is to target an average return of at least CPI + 4 to + 5 per cent per annum over the long term, with acceptable levels of risk; to maintain holding limits for any listed company; to undertake its investment activities in a way that minimises the potential to cause damage to the operation of Australian financial markets and which is unlikely to effect the reputation of the government; and act with “regard to international best practice for institutional investment in determining its approach to corporate governance principles”.

    The last time that mandate was changed was 2017, when the return target was lowered by 50 basis points. While Gallagher said that it’s “routine good governance” to periodically review the mandate, Future Fund chief executive Raphael Arndt has, in the past, been resistant to the idea of changing it. Back in January, Arndt said that it was important the Future Fund’s mandate “stay pure” while highlighting its existing domestic investments across renewable energy and digital infrastructure.

    And there have as yet been no “out of the ordinary” changes to investment strategy, with Gallagher and Arndt stressing that discussions were at a nascent stage and that any changes would be required to go through a formal consultation and legislative process.

    “We haven’t received any formal change or any proposed change to the investment mandate through that mechanism,” Arndt said. “There’s a range of discussions that have been had with the department around different ideas and options but nothing concluded… (We’ve been asked) if there was a change in this direction or that direction would it have a material impact on how you invest and your ability or expectation of meeting the expected return set out in the mandate.

    “We haven’t changed our reporting, and we haven’t changed our investment strategy either, but we have been investing in assets that assist the energy transition for quite a long time.”

    The most recent push for Australia’s sovereign wealth fund to play a bigger part in nation building and the transition to net zero began with a 2023 paper from the Climate Energy Finance and the Climate Capital Forum that suggested adding a “strategic national interest objective” to the Future Fund’s mandate and allocating millions to critical mining and renewables sectors.

    New chairman Greg Combet, whose appointment was met with consternation from the federal opposition and former Future Fund chair David Murray owing to his background in the union movement and industry superannuation, has also been open to the idea that the Future Fund could invest more into the energy transition.

    “One of the interests that I have, coming onto the Board of Guardians is to have a look at where the investment opportunities might lie in the future to aid the energy transition,” Combet said in the Future Fund’s annual report. “Obviously, those investments need to be consistent with proper commercial judgement and fit into a diversified portfolio, but the Future Fund’s already a significant investor in energy assets, and I’ll be interested to see whether we can add to that.”

    Lachlan Maddock

    Lachlan is editor of Investor Strategy News and has extensive experience covering institutional investment.




    Print Article

    Related
    How to stop worrying and learn to live with (if not love) tariffs

    A second Trump presidency and the potential for a new US trade regime increases uncertainty as we head into 2025. But despite the prevailing zeitgeist of unease, emerging market investors have various reasons to be sanguine, according to Ninety One

    Alan Siow | 18th Dec 2024 | More
    Why investors should beware the Trump bump

    Tweets aren’t policy, but Yarra Capital believes that financial markets are underestimating Trump’s intentions. Expect 2025 to be the year of higher debt, higher inflation and lower growth – not to mention plenty of volatility.

    Lachlan Maddock | 13th Dec 2024 | More
    How to get a ‘return on time’ in private markets

    Private market returns are nothing to sneeze at, but investors need to consider whether their prospective allocation is worth doing the hard work to understand the liquidity and transparency issues that come with it.

    Lachlan Maddock | 13th Dec 2024 | More
    Popular